Sebastian Fanselow vs Nikolai Barsukov Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How do the players compare in second serve performance? Fanselow manages 41.04% of points on second serve, while Barsukov secures 44.87%, indicating a slight edge for Barsukov.
• In return games, Fanselow wins 47.28% of opponent's second serve points, compared to Barsukov's 50.24%, further favoring Barsukov.
• First serve return percentages are virtually identical, with Fanselow at 29.46% and Barsukov at 29.4%.
• Under pressure, Barsukov is slightly better, saving 52.31% of breakpoints, while Fanselow saves 50%.
• Fanselow's match win rate over the past year is 37.04%, lower than Barsukov's 42.11% rate, suggesting Barsukov's superior form.
• Assessing surface preferences, Fanselow excels on Hard courts with a 62% win rate, whereas Barsukov finds most success on Clay with a 44% win rate.
• Both players mostly compete in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, with Barsukov holding a slightly better recent win rate of 42.11% compared to Fanselow's 37.5%.
• In terms of competition level, Fanselow faces opponents with an average ranking of 452.85, marginally more challenging than Barsukov's 475 average.
• For deciding sets, Barsukov holds an advantage, winning 57% compared to Fanselow's 33% over the last year.
• When it comes to break point conversion, Fanselow slightly leads with a 38.24% success rate, narrowly ahead of Barsukov's 36.84%.

Editorial Prediction (August 14, 2025, UTC):

As the upcoming match approaches, the statistics provide a clear narrative of each player's recent form and play style. Fanselow demonstrates reliability on Hard surfaces, achieving a notable win rate on this court type. However, his overall performance appears to lag slightly behind Barsukov.

Barsukov's prowess is evident in several areas, including second serve performance and return game statistics, both of which are slightly superior compared to Fanselow. Under pressure, Barsukov has also demonstrated an ability to withstand breakpoint situations better.

In the context of competitive matches and tighter situations that result in deciding sets, Barsukov emerges as the more resilient player, underscoring his potential edge. While Fanselow has slight advantages in break point opportunities, Barsukov's consistent performance makes him a formidable opponent.

Considering Fanselow's better surface adaptability on Hard courts and overall match toughness, Barsukov could still face challenges. However, when assessing the broad spectrum of recent performance metrics, Barsukov is slightly favored to win this upcoming tennis match.